Wednesday, 19 August 2015

JUSTIFICATIONS OF CORRUPTION

REASON FOR CORRUPTION

REASON FOR CORRUPTION


Corruption is a social evil, the offspring of mutilated mindset, founded upon selfish concepts.. 

The concept that my corruption is justified, and his corruption is malice is the foundation of it. Even a poor man/lady, being victim of corruption will advise their son to join a profession, having much possibility of earning corrupt and unethical money. They will never tell him to fight against corruption. As a society, we value the rich, and give them social status, without looking into the corrupt ways, he used to earn it. It gives a motivation to others to use the same unethical means, so that he knows that the money he earns can wipe out the stain on his reputation... 

When corrupt people contest elections, those who talk very eloquently against corruption also vote for such corrupt people, making the genuine persons out of power and authority.... 

So who is responsible? 

Its the result of our mutilated mindsets and misplaced social values.....


...Adv.A.C.Philip

Sunday, 9 August 2015

FOUND SOLUTION TO TERRORISM


FOUND SOLUTION TO TERRORISM

First week of August,2015 was hectic in terms of news with respect to hanging of Yakub Memon and many arguments in favour and against in continuation from the previous week, and further was fuelled by multiple terrorist attacks. There were no dearth for sensational news. Among the same,  many may not have noticed the eastern frontier of India, where quite some people were celebrating independence with overflowing happiness. The news about their happiness almost got drenched and drowned in the propagation of hate and violence.  
You may ask, me why I am going into unnecessary and irrelevant areas. But surely I see some interrelationship between two. Look at the eastern frontier. There are many religious people, predominantly Hindus and Muslims. There is poverty among them. There is competition for resources. There are multiplicity of culture and world vision involved, international border involved, boarder disputes involved, and conflict of interest involved, conflict of river water sharing involved. If we look at them, all are enough to make the situation worse for perennial armed conflicts, mistrust and terrorism.
Same way let us turn our mirror into the western frontier of our nation. The ground situation is almost equal and similar, as described above.
Whereas during the same time, the eastern frontier was celebrating their independence, sharing the love, care, and hugging each other, as an outcome of resolving the conflict, sitting across the table, discussing,  adopting give and take policy, keeping in mind the paramount interest of the people at large, not looking at each other as communities, but as Humans. But in contrast to it, on the western front, there were firings, breaks of cease fire agreement, deaths, anger, infiltration, killing, hanging the terrorist, crying, revenge, and ‘n’ number of unresolved issues, which led to the impossible situation to sit around the table and talk.  
So what made the difference?
So is the requirement to learn from history, rather than just learning the history. Our conflict on both the frontiers starts way back to 1947, when the nation was divided on religious terms. The division occurred at both the ends, with (then) eastern Pakistan, now Bangladesh,  and western Pakistan as well. The ground realities were same. The world’s mightiest armed forces were present with its full vigour at the western front to contain violence. But it failed. It not only failed for that time, but nearing a century, the use of force continues to fail. The use of force to contain violence and establish human love and care did not found success. The bloodshed continues. The hate continues. For this we saw many armed conflicts. The revenge continues to breed contempt, feeding into violence and hate, resulting into more bloodshed and terrorism.
But at that point of time, western front had seen the presence of not the mighty army, but the sacrificial Ahimsa, as propagated by Gandhiji. His declaration of sacrificial involvement, making a clear universal brotherhood across the warring and conflicting communities, where the peace was established for the generations to come. Even when there are conflicts of interest, inter religious issues, the terms are within the possibility of resolving the issues through mutual talks, based upon mutual trust and confidence building measures, leaving the common man ultimate beneficiary. The Humanity is victorious there, neither both sides.
So the bottom line is, violence breeds violence. Revenge breeds revenge.  Arms are not the tools to establish lasting peace among humanity. It’s the sacrificial brotherhood, and sharing and caring each other, which will breed the peace and tranquillity.
That’s the only solution to the ongoing terrorism world over.

  Nothing else.